![]()
web sites: Cork’d vs. CellarTracker!
The record of my wine life for the past 2 and a half years has survived in various and progressively more modern forms… a hand-written journal, a scrapbook of labels, a large deck of alphabetized index cards, an Excel spreadsheet, and finally this blog. No source is an overall authority. In fact, most that live in one form, do not live in any other. Considering that I have built an entire web site around combining my love for “vinology” and “technology”, it was beyond time for me to take my wine lifestream and digitize it. And once I go digital, I never plan on going back.
Almost a year ago, I wrote a blog about what my dream wine web experience would be, in fact, a “web 3.0″ version of a wine site. But lately, my need has become so immediate that I’m willing to seek a more realistic solution while I wait for my dream one to arrive.
There are pieces of my dream out there… there are recommendation engines (Snooth), social networks (Cork’d), and robust organizational tools (CellarTracker), but each are failing to live up to their full potential. Cork’d was at one point a segment darling, but the platform hasn’t been updated in many months. In an effort to be very user friendly, the site is severely limited by it’s simplicity and user generated content. Snooth, in an effort to be more robust than Cork’d, suffers from a less than intuitive user experience. And CellarTracker? Well, it is just plain UGLY.
So… I decided the only way to really commit was to try them all.
Using Snooth, I only got about five entries in before giving up. Honestly, it was just a personal preference, and maybe I will end up trying it again. But, I wanted to give Cork’d priority because of its WineLibraryTV associations and use of the industry standard 100-point system. I built my Cork’d profile to over fifty wine reviews before throwing in the towel there. I was loving the AJAX form entry goodness and I was having fun tagging my wines with words like “zesty” and “musty”. But, as my list grew and grew, it became really unmanageable. No sorting ability? Really? What happens when I get up to my full 350 wine history?
The other big problem with Cork’d is that it all relies on user entered wine data. They are not connected to the big wine database in the sky, so they are completely dependent on user discretion and whim to fill in data accurately and remain consistent (although Cork’d offers them no “best practices” there). A wine entered by one user as “2005 McManis Petite Sirah” and another as “McManis 2005 Petite Sirah” are ultimately the same wine, but because of platform limitations, they will appear as though they were two separate wines.
Frustrated, I left the world of Cork’d, plugged my nose and began my adventure with CellarTracker, my last option left. Why does it have to be so very ugly? It looks like something ancient, something Web 0.5, with blue links, black text on white, and non-existent margins. But, to my pleasant surprise, the functionality was all that I needed and then some. A huger than huge wine database that allows me to easily review, rate, cellar, buy, and add to my “wish list”? Unlimited customizable wish lists? An easy to use mobile version? The ability to tie my blog entries to wines I’ve rated? Wow!!
You can really make the site what you want (well, except pretty). You can even save your favorite review sources and wine shops.
There are still some limits that seem easy enough to fix:
1. Make it a little more like my NetVibes. Allow me to feed in my own favorite wine RSS to populate expert reviews, wine articles, and industry news. Why should I have to manually add articles?
2. Give me the ability to do some limited skinning. If you aren’t going to make it pretty, at least let me!!
3. Take some learnings from Cork’d. Can I have a profile please, just to add a little flavor and make things a little more social? Oh, and you definitely need to hop onto the tagging bandwagon. Wines are not just regions, varietals, and 100-point ratings, they are flavors, smells, and experiences.
I can’t believe I’m saying it, but I think that stinky ol’ CellarTracker has the most opportunity to become the ultimate web wine tool. With the lack of updates and robust personalization on Cork’d, they wouldn’t even have to try that hard. It’s no longer about social for social sake, but the ability to personalize the tools and experience. If CellarTracker can just add a pretty face and some extensions, they could really be a force to be reckoned with.
Marta - thanks for mentioning Snooth. I’d love to get some feedback as to where our site let you down, thanks
Comment by Philip James — March 14, 2008 @ 11:10 am
Marta,
Sorry you had to hold your nose (I prefer to think of CellarTracker as nerdy more than stinky), but your feedback is fair. Anyway, I really appreciate the feedback!
Sincerely,
-Eric LeVine
CellarTracker.com
Comment by Eric LeVine — March 14, 2008 @ 1:19 pm
Cellar Tracker Ugly?
What matters is what it does, not what color it is. The data is what is important, not the surroundings.
Pretty is as pretty does
(I have no idea what that means but I heard it on some TV show and it sounds appropriate - then again I have no idea what “Why should I have to manually articles?” either)
Comment by Peter May — March 14, 2008 @ 5:19 pm
[…] marta wrote a fantastic post today on “Digitizing My Wine Life”Here’s ONLY a quick extractMy wine life for the past 2 and a half years has survived in various and progressively more modern forms… a hand-written journal, a scrapbook of labels, a large deck of alphabetized index cards, an Excel spreadsheet, and finally this … […]
Pingback by Alcohol Posts » Digitizing My Wine Life — March 14, 2008 @ 7:16 pm
Thanks Philip and Eric for commenting on my blog. I didn’t know I’d be getting the attention so I used some playful language (ie stinky) without totally meaning it. I do think that Snooth has some great features, and look forward to giving it a fuller chance now that I have accomplished my first goal of digitizing my wine history. And I am getting more excited about Snooth than Cork’d currently… you have to wonder about a site that’s last updated was 10 months ago.
Peter… there is a lot to be said about making something more attractive. The first thing a good interface designer learns is how to use design clues to help guide the user experience. Design can help tell a user what a site is, what’s important, where to go next. It isn’t just pretty for pretty sake.
If you read my actual suggestions to CellarTracker, you would see that it had more to do with functionality additions than aesthetics, except for my comment about skinning. The motive behind that being that I see CellarTracker to have the potential to be more of a one-stop destination, a “start page” into your web wine experience… and like any good room in your house that you like to relax in, start your day in, you are probably going to want it to suit your needs AND your tastes and that includes from a visual standpoint.
Comment by marta — March 14, 2008 @ 11:19 pm
[…] found myself getting into an interesting discussion the other day, after posting my plea to make CellarTracker “prettier”: “The first thing a good interface designer […]
Pingback by Marta Strickland's blog - recentlyconsumed.com - digesting technology and vinology — March 19, 2008 @ 11:28 pm