recentlyconsumed.com

Brilliant But Cancelled

tasting notes

We can all relate to the idea of the brilliant TV show canceled before its expiration date. Oh blast the network executives that don’t give shows their room to grow and the audience to come. But isn’t that the fun of them too… the cult classic, the sleeper hit.

However, it doesn’t exactly work this way for the world of web. No other medium is so integrated into the audience experience. There are brilliant ideas out there everywhere, but they are wasted and fade away because the community never comes to join them, because the web master never has the avid audience to inspire them to continue. One of my favorite “brilliant but cancelled” websites has been Disturbing Auctions, a site that helped to catalog and put hilarious commentary on Ebay’s weirdest auctions. But unfortunately, the site never turned into more than a hobby for the web master and never gathered a big enough audience to switch it over into the amazing web 2.0 comedy site it could of been.

A list of other web deaths resides here: an Internet graveyard.

So, what websites of today are the e-gravestones of tomorrow? In the sea of Web 2.0 betas dependent completely on user adoption and generated content, who will survive and who will become buried under the waves. And to think for every few sites that even make it to beta, a dozen died before making it through development. I’d love to see Mashable start an obituary report of all the betas it announced in its days that never came to fruition. Farewell, good idea, good execution, but no one in the forest to hear it make a sound when it fell.

I’d love to hear from other people about their most memorable web sites that have come and gone and never got the chance they deserved.

suggested pairings



2 Responses to “Brilliant But Cancelled”

  1. Roxy Says:

    The world wide web is such an incredibly huge place. It’s a wonder some websites ever get seen at all. It appears to take a lot of work to get the word out about a website. Sometimes there hardly seems enough time in the day. I often wonder how certain crappy sites get their hits and other ingenious ones go unnoticed. Like online comedy troops for instance. How does all the unfunny poo end up with a billion million hits on their website and other drop dead hilarious material slips under the radar? It’s a shame sometimes, but unless you have a certain number of hours a day to devote to pushing your site, you risk complete anonymity.

  2. dan klyn Says:

    An interesting case study that kinda straddles the 1.0 - 2.0 eras of the social web is Friendster. NYT business section online has comprehensive coverage of the maybe-immanent death of Friendster. Lessons learned seem to be:

    * being one of the first players in a new category sucks
    * having plenty of money cant save you from a crap user experience
    * big disconnects that develop between who you think your audience is and who they actually are need to be round-tripped back to the overall strategy or yr screwed

    Viddy link:
    http://video.on.nytimes.com/index.jsp?fr_story=e13e43ee30b5f85d1a7d64195fa49dfffca5dec5

    Article link:
    http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/15/business/yourmoney/15friend.html?emc=eta1

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

 
consumable goods consumed on
RECENT WINES
    twitter for wine : life


    follow me on twitter